<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://port25.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Systems Manageability – Part 2: Scope, Methodology and Ontology</title><link>http://port25.technet.com/archive/2007/04/06/systems-manageability-part-2-scope-methodology-and-ontology.aspx</link><description>In my last blog called “Why Manageability Matters” I talked about why we chose to work on “Systems Manageability” as a whole and get a grassroots understanding of it within the context of Linux and Open Source space. In this blog, I’m going to address</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 40109.1145)</generator><item><title>re: Systems Manageability – Part 2: Scope, Methodology and Ontology</title><link>http://port25.technet.com/archive/2007/04/06/systems-manageability-part-2-scope-methodology-and-ontology.aspx#3868</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 19:30:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">af7480c4-26b7-468d-87b0-2acebabb473d:3868</guid><dc:creator>ajaymm</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Kishi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Perfect .. thanks for the clarification. It helps to clearly understand what success really looks like. I think your effort will be of tremendous value for people trying to understand Manageability &amp;amp; the options(products/tools) they have at their disposal. I also hope that you will include products/tools that are based on Intel vPro processor technology featuring Intel Active Management Technology in your analysis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ajay Mungara &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://port25.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3868" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Systems Manageability Part 3 - Provisioning and Deployment</title><link>http://port25.technet.com/archive/2007/04/06/systems-manageability-part-2-scope-methodology-and-ontology.aspx#3865</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 21:04:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">af7480c4-26b7-468d-87b0-2acebabb473d:3865</guid><dc:creator>Port 25</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Deployment and Provisioning as we understand it, encompasses all tasks related to the initial installation of an operating system on remote system, as well as post-installation of software on a remote system. Much of these toolsets are geared toward automated&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://port25.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3865" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Systems Manageability – Part 2: Scope, Methodology and Ontology</title><link>http://port25.technet.com/archive/2007/04/06/systems-manageability-part-2-scope-methodology-and-ontology.aspx#3796</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:00:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">af7480c4-26b7-468d-87b0-2acebabb473d:3796</guid><dc:creator>kishi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ajay,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes you are correct. I am looking at the Tools / Products in the specific ontology that has been defined. My next blog is going to be on the first category i.e. Provisioning and Deployment. Success of the project will be an analysis of all six categories.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://port25.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3796" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Systems Manageability – Part 2: Scope, Methodology and Ontology</title><link>http://port25.technet.com/archive/2007/04/06/systems-manageability-part-2-scope-methodology-and-ontology.aspx#3750</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:48:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">af7480c4-26b7-468d-87b0-2acebabb473d:3750</guid><dc:creator>ajaymm</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Kishi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you primarily looking at Server Manageability (data center)? Are you looking at tools/products that operate in the specific ontology you define? If I understand it correctly, you are going analyze these tools in your lab and then write a paper on your findings. Well, the bottom line is I don't understand from your blog post what success for your project really looks like? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ajay Mungara&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://port25.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3750" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>James Governor&amp;#8217;s Monkchips &amp;raquo; links for 2007-04-10</title><link>http://port25.technet.com/archive/2007/04/06/systems-manageability-part-2-scope-methodology-and-ontology.aspx#3711</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:34:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">af7480c4-26b7-468d-87b0-2acebabb473d:3711</guid><dc:creator>James Governor’s Monkchips » links for 2007-04-10</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/10/links-for-2007-04-10/"&gt;http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/10/links-for-2007-04-10/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://port25.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3711" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>