<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://port25.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Better Windows Development Environments - One project at a Time</title><link>http://port25.technet.com/archive/2009/04/10/better-windows-development-environments-one-project-at-a-time.aspx</link><description>Discussions of the PC market usually break down into "desktop" vs. "server", as if these are the only platform categories. However, the developer's dev box -- call it a "workstation" to distinguish it from desktop -- is really a separate platform. Remember</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 40109.1145)</generator><item><title>re: Better Windows Development Environments - One project at a Time</title><link>http://port25.technet.com/archive/2009/04/10/better-windows-development-environments-one-project-at-a-time.aspx#25629</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 11:48:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">af7480c4-26b7-468d-87b0-2acebabb473d:25629</guid><dc:creator>How I Lost Thirty Pounds in Thirty Days</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, good post. I have been thinking about this topic,so thanks for sharing. I will certainly be subscribing to your blog.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://port25.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=25629" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Better Windows Development Environments - One project at a Time</title><link>http://port25.technet.com/archive/2009/04/10/better-windows-development-environments-one-project-at-a-time.aspx#25277</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:35:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">af7480c4-26b7-468d-87b0-2acebabb473d:25277</guid><dc:creator>remdotc</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The biggest issue I have with Windows Development is cost. While big corporations can easily shell out 2K for a MSDN license, Small to medium businesses &amp;quot;might &amp;quot; pay that fee, where hobbyists and students who lack funds will go with environments where free sources are available. &amp;nbsp;Added to the Open Source movement is a rich environment of documentation and tools, all available for free, and given the current economic situation where everyone is making budgetary cuts, 800 for a IDE like Visual Studio 2008, 2000 for MSDN, 780 for Windows Server &amp;nbsp;Standard Edition is a bit much when Cygwin and most linux distrobutions offer a plethora of free tools. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://port25.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=25277" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Better Windows Development Environments - One project at a Time</title><link>http://port25.technet.com/archive/2009/04/10/better-windows-development-environments-one-project-at-a-time.aspx#24981</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:41:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">af7480c4-26b7-468d-87b0-2acebabb473d:24981</guid><dc:creator>DanF</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good observation Mark.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know I&amp;#39;d be more willing to come back to Windows if they made it more accessible for hobbyist developers. As an amateur programmer in Linux I have access to a huge array of great tools, on Windows I used to have nothing. Now I have the &amp;quot;* Express editions&amp;quot; which are a pretty good start. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also think Mono is a big help in encouraging adoption of .Net -- looks promising. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://port25.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=24981" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>