Infrastructure Management and Strategic Design: Part 4 – Service Management Frameworks - Port 25: The Open Source Community at Microsoft
< Back to Blogs
Infrastructure Management and Strategic Design: Part 4 – Service Management Frameworks by jcannon on August 01, 2006 02:51PM

Today, the IT departments offering and managing various IT Services might find themselves in what I would call a “pressure-cooker”. They are faced with a multitude of tasks and added pressure to maintain daily operations while driving efficacy, managing the growing complexity of Service Offerings and most importantly, doing so while keeping pace with the industry best practices. This has been one of the most explosive areas of growth and re-examination for the past few years. Back in my Ops days, I trained under ITIL i.e. IT Infrastructure Library and MOF i.e. Microsoft Operations Fundamentals to get a first hand look at some of the best Service Management practices in the industry. No matter how good I thought our Service Management practices might have been, I could not help but to think in terms of the maturity level of the Services that can be achieved by applying these principles. When you get down to it, you realize that the heart and soul of effective Service Management lies in how mature the offering and support model is.  I have learnt a lot from the ITIL Service Management Essentials course, which I attribute to research and practices that have gone into developing these models. I’d like to share w/ you what made sense to me:

  • Bridge Concept: As described in various ITIL formats, Service Management can be referred to as the “bridge layer” between Business and Technology. It is through the conduit of Service Management that core business needs as well as core technologies find their match with each other. This is attained by aligning the Business Needs and Goals of the organization with the various technologies and IT functions that can map to these overall goals 
  • Think Framework: Once you have scoped out, what may be a void in the service hierarchy of your organization, make a commitment to implementing a Service Management and Delivery framework that is suitable for your org. One size DOES NOT fit all and although I am only talking about ITIL concepts here, there are several methodologies you can explore before making the plunge.
  • Benefits of implementing a Service Management Framework: In just a few minutes after sitting in the ITIL Essentials Training class I was able to get a very crisp idea of what the benefits of implementing a Service Management Framework are. To name a few –
    • Raising the bar on Service Delivery Quality
    • More accurate alignment w/ Business Needs
    • Enhanced relationship between service provider and consumer
    • Deeper visibility into service complexity
    • Driving efficiencies with optimal resource utilization  
  • Goals for implementing a Service Management Framework: if and when you do make the commitment to implementing a Service Management Framework, here’s a quick set of goals you can set when you proceed with the implementation of Service Management:
    • Put an SLA ( Service Level Agreement) or an SLO (Service Level Objective) around the critical and non-critical services you offer, respectively
    • Manage and monitor the implementation and practice of these SLA’s and SLO’s
    • Create and publish a service catalog describing the services offered by your IT department/division
    • Monetize the service management offerings, even if your customers are internal. This will help quantify the service effectiveness and bring measurability across the board
  • Additional Resources: the itSMF or IT Service Management Forum (www.itsmf.com ) is an independent,  non-profit, user group distributed all across the world that has dedicated itself to exploring and promoting IT Service Management concepts and practices.

I am very eager to hear back from those of you that are an integral part of the Service Management Lifecycle. Please share your experiences, challenges and learning with us.

Kindest Regards and have a great week ahead!

Comments RSS
  1. einhverfr said:

    I am still in the early stages... But it seems clear to me that some of the major challenges include tracking installed and managed services, and being able to provide for various contingencies such as disconnected operation, etc. Some of the major issues involve: 1) Version and Upgrade Tracking 2) Configuration management. 3) Policy management 4) Single Point of Truth (this is actually the most difficult aspect, especially when disconnected operation is required). I am not a big fan of most business process management frameworks. Industry standards are just the best that some people can think of and while they are worth reading, they are usually not worth following (businesses are notorious for lacking an ability to objectively look beyond measurements to root benefits or costs). This is not to go too much into my approach to managing these sorts of things but I will say that software must support divergance from the accepted industry-recognized best practices.

    posted at 01:26AM 08/02/2006
  2. einhverfr said:

    "# Monetize the service management offerings, even if your customers are internal. This will help quantify the service effectiveness and bring measurability across the board "

    I am not a fan of this idea.  THe problem is that it creates additional overhead both in terms of general accounting and budgetting by various departments.  It also tends to lead to resentment by people whose jobs (managing budgets) are made markedly more difficult.  If some other departments (such as the ergonomics department) follow suit, the result can be discouraging people from getting access to services they need.

    So it can have some positive effects, but at the cost of a great deal of complexity and additional problems.  Complexity is generally the enemy.

    One of the serious problems with many of these best practices is that many businesses attempt to implement them to make themselves look better and are unable to look beyond the chosen (industry-standard) metrics.  This means that one often "teaches to the test" so to speak rather than encouraging substantive improvements.  Thus many management frameworks, whether ITIL (for IT), COPC (for call centers) are usually based on obvious and good ideas but implemented as bandaids over bigger problems that need to be solved first (to make COPC actually be substantive, one must also first create a customer-centric culture, for example).

    posted at 12:01PM 08/02/2006
  3. 'Hybrid mutant' found dead in Maine &quot;This is something I've never seen before. It's an evil-looking thing.&quot; Whao this whole article is like an HP Lovecraft story...and it's even in New England. (tags: via:sogrady lovecraft weird dogs hybridmutant)

    posted at 03:21AM 08/19/2006
Post a Comment
*
*